I was happy to see that these chapters started to bring to light some
new ways to use technology in the classroom. I especially loved some of the
ideas in chapter 6. Google Alerts, for example, will enable me as a science
teacher to stay up to date with current scientific news and discoveries. Like
our textbook said, most textbooks are out of date by the time they come out in
print, and science books are often very far behind the curve. Programs like
Google Alert ensure that my own knowledge is more up to date than these
textbooks; as a result, I can provide my students with the most current
information possible. Hopefully students will be able to see the relevance of
modern scientific discoveries in their own lives, which will motivate them to
learn more on their own. I think it would also be a great idea to ask students
to make a Google Alerts account on their own so that they could get news about
topics they are interested in. Is it
possible to create a viable class assignment surrounding the use of such a
tool?
Standards connectors and tag clouds, also mentioned in chapter 6,
appear to be excellent resources to help teachers stay organized. I’ve never
thought of a good way to compile resources and usually just resort to listing
links in a Word Document when I find a new source. Standards connectors and tag
clouds actually provide teachers with the option to classify and search for
their own resources, and are extremely valuable, time-saving tools I will be
sure to take advantage of. Should we
provide our students with access to these resources and/or give them the
ability to contribute to them?
Despite some of the great ideas mentioned in these chapters, I found
that a few strategies were mentioned that would not be viable in all
classrooms. For example, I really like the idea of using learning centers in a
high school classroom. However, I fear that with only one teacher in the room,
students would easily go off task, especially when they get to the computer
station. In response, I wish this book spoke more about the strategies a
teacher can use to set the tone for responsible computer usage.
Another concern I have about learning centers regards technical
difficulties experienced in class. What
does the teacher do when he or she is called over to troubleshoot a problem or
error in the operation of the computers? If he or she leaves to fix the
problem, the group who should be receiving direct instruction is left alone,
but if he or she does not, the group who should be at the computers will be
left without a task. As such, I see this classroom technique working well only
if two or more adults are in the classroom, or if the students are highly
responsible and in control of their own learning.
I am also somewhat hesitant about the use of tools like virtual field
trips. Although beneficial if students absolutely cannot go on a traditional
field trip, I don’t see how a virtual experience could replace one in person. Field trips are difficult to pull off
because they can be very costly and time consuming and they require teachers to
be liable for their students outside of the classroom, but aren’t real-world
learning experiences outside of the classroom invaluable and often
irreplaceable? Is it worth missing
out on such an experience so that students could spend more time in class
preparing for high stakes exams?
I think it will take a few years of acclimating to the teaching
profession before I will be able to use technology most effectively. I see
myself using it, as chapter 4 says, at the adaptation and appropriation stages
for a while, especially to communicate information with students and parents,
organize data, and present information. I hope that as years pass I could make
my way towards the invention stage, where my students’ learning experiences are
truly enriched by technology – but I think it will take a while before I get
there.
I absolutely love and agree with this thought: “…but aren’t real-world learning experiences outside of the classroom invaluable and often irreplaceable?” Thinking back to my elementary school days, I remember going on virtual field trips using Encarta and still feeling less than satisfied because I couldn’t see beyond the scope of the 360 degree view. I wanted to reach out and touch what was on screen and walk around the places, but the virtual experience proved to be only a mild substitute for the real thing, kind of like when you watch people on a roller coaster on TV and the camera shows us the ride from the perspective of the riders.
ReplyDeleteGetting out and exploring the real places where our subjects come to life is indispensable to providing meaningful learning experiences. Unfortunately, field trips that allow this to occur are becoming more difficult to undertake due to the factors you stated. However, their impact remains undeniable. Just a few weeks ago, I was discussing Theodore Roosevelt and his role in the Spanish-American War with my 8th grade American History II class. As we spoke, one of my students asked if it would be possible to visit Sagamore Hill, Roosevelt’s home in Oyster Bay, since it was so close to their school. Given the reality in schools today, I wasn’t sure how to respond since on the one hand I might instill false hope for a possible trip yet on the other I could run with the status quo and speak too soon. Consequently, I gave him a completely neutral answer tinged with an modicum of hope. This experience reminded me that we should strive to preserve and promote field trips as essential components to differentiated instruction since they appeal to all types of learners while also providing outlets for students’ individual strengths and interests.